ABSTRACT
Introduction: Combination of daratumumab (Dara) and lenalidomide (Len) may enhance the function of teclistamab (Tec), potentially resulting in improved antimyeloma activity in a broader population. We present initial safety and efficacy data of Tec-Dara- Len combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 1b study (MajesTEC-2;NCT04722146). Method(s): Eligible patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and immune-modulatory drug, were given weekly doses of Tec (0.72-or- 1.5 mg/kg with step-up dosing) + Dara 1800 mg + Len 25 mg. Responses per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, adverse events (Aes) per CTCAE v5.0, and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per ASTCT guidelines, were assessed. Result(s): 32 patients received Tec-Dara- Len (0.72 mg/kg, n = 13;1.5 mg/kg, n = 19). At data cut-off (11 July 2022), median follow-up (range) was 5.78 months (1.0-10.4) and median treatment duration was 4.98 months (0.10-10.35). Median age was 62 years (38-75);87.5% were male. Median prior LOT was 2 (1-3), 18.8% were refractory to Dara and 28.1% refractory to Len. CRS was most frequent AE (81.3% [n = 26], all grade 1/2), 95% occurred during cycle1. Median time to onset was 2 days (1-8), median duration was 2 days (1-22). No ICANS were reported. Frequent Aes (>=25.0% across both dose levels) were neutropenia (75.0% [n = 24];grade 3/4: 68.8% [n = 22]), fatigue (43.8% [n = 14];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]), diarrhoea (37.5% [n = 12];all grade 1/2), insomnia (31.3% [n = 10];grade 3/4: 3.1% [n = 1]), cough (28.1% [n = 9];all grade 1/2), hypophosphatemia (25.0% [n = 8];all grade 1/2), and pyrexia (25% [n = 8];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]). Febrile neutropenia frequency was 12.5% (n = 4). Infections occurred in 24 patients (75.0%;grade 3/4: 28.1% [n = 9]). Most common were upper respiratory infection (21.9% [n = 7]), COVID-19 (21.9% [n = 7]), and pneumonia (21.9% [n = 7]). Three (9.4%) had COVID-19 pneumonia. One (3.1%) discontinued due to COVID-19 infection and this patient subsequently died of this infection. Overall response rate (ORR, median follow-up) was 13/13 (8.61 months) at 0.72 mg/kg and 13/16 evaluable patients (less mature at 4.17 months) at 1.5 mg/kg. 12 patients attained very good/better partial response at 0.72 mg/kg dose, and response was not mature for 1.5 mg/kg group. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7-2.0). Preliminary pharmacokinetic concentrations of Tec-Dara- Len were similar as seen with Tec monotherapy. Tec-Dara- Len- treatment led to proinflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. Conclusion(s): The combination of Tec-Dara- Len has no new safety signals beyond those seen with Tec or Dara-Len individually. Promising ORR supports the potential for this combination to have enhanced early disease control through the addition of Tec. These data warrant further investigation.
ABSTRACT
The TG6002.03 trial is a dose-escalation phase 1 clinical trial of TG6002 infusion via the hepatic artery in patients with liver-dominant colorectal cancer metastases. TG6002 is an engineered Copenhagen strain oncolytic Vaccinia virus, deleted of thymidine kinase and ribonucleotide reductase to enhance tumor selective viral replication and expressing FCU1, an enzyme converting the non-cytotoxic prodrug 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) into the chemotherapeutic compound 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this trial, patients with advanced unresectable liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed previous oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy were treated with up to 2 cycles of TG6002 infusion 6 weeks apart via the hepatic artery on day 1 combined with oral 5-FC on days 5 to 14 (where day 1 = TG6002 infusion). TG6002 infusion was performed over 30 minutes via selective catheterization of the hepatic artery proper. 5-FC oral dosing was 50mg/kg x4 daily. Blood was sampled for TG6002 pharmacokinetics and 5-FC and 5-FU measurements. Sampling of liver metastases was performed at screening and on day 4 or day 8 for virus detection and 5-FC and 5-FU quantification. In total, 15 patients (median age 61 years, range 37-78) were treated in 1 UK centre and 2 centres in France and received a dose of TG6002 of 1 x 106 (n=3), 1 x 107 (n=3), 1 x 108 (n=3), or 1 x 109 pfu (n=6). Fourteen of the 15 patients received a single cycle of treatment, including one patient who did not received 5-FC, and one patient received two cycles. TG6002 was transiently detected in plasma following administration, suggesting a strong tissue selectivity for viral replication. In the highest dose cohort, a virus rebound was observed on day 8, concordant with replication time of the virus. In serum samples, 5-FU was present on day 8 in all patients with a high variability ranging from 0.8 to 1072 ng/mL and was measurable over several days after initiation of therapy. Seven of the 9 patients evaluable showed the biodistribution of the virus in liver lesions by PCR testing on day 4 or day 8. Translational blood samples showed evidence for T-cell activation and immune checkpoint receptor-ligand expression. At 1 x 109 pfu, there was evidence for T-cell proliferation and activation against tumour-associated antigens by ELISpot and for immunogenic cell death. In terms of safety, a total of 34 TG6002-related adverse events were reported, of which 32 were grade 1-2 and 2 were grade 3. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and a single dose-limiting toxicity was observed consisting of a myocardial infarction in a context of recent Covid-19 infection in a 78-year-old patient. These results indicate that TG6002 infused via the hepatic artery in combination with oral 5-FC was well tolerated, effectively localized and replicated in the tumor tissues, expressed its therapeutic payload and showed anti-tumoral immunological activity.
ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolutionized solid tumor treatment, however, in many tumors only partial response is achieved. Allocetra-OTS has an immune modulating effect on macrophages and dendritic cells and showed an excellent safety profile in patients including patients with sepsis and Covid-19. Here we investigated the anti-tumoral effect of Allocetra-OTS cellular therapy, in peritoneal solid tumor animal models. Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): Allocetra-OTS is manufactured from enriched mononuclear fractions and induced to undergo early apoptosis. Balb/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally (IP) with AB12 (mesothelioma) with pLenti-PGK-V5-Luc-Neo and treated with anti- CTLA4 with or without Allocetra-OTS. Mice were monitored daily for clinical score and weekly using IVIS (Fig.1). Kaplan-Meier log rank test was done for survival. For Allocetra-OTS preparation, enriched mononuclear fractions were collected by leukapheresis from healthy eligible human donors and induced to undergo early apoptosis. Anti- CTLA4 standalone therapy significantly improved survival (Fig.2) from mean 34+/-9 to 44.9 +/-20 days. However, OTS standalone therapy was non-inferior and improved survival to 52.3 +/-20 days. Anti-CTLA4 + Allocetra-OTS combination therapy, ameliorated survival to 86.7+/-20 days with complete cancer remission in 60-100% of mice. Similar anti- tumoral effects of Allocetra-OTS were seen in mesothelioma model in a combination therapy with either anti-PD1 or cisplatin and using anti-PD1 in ID8 ovary cancer model. Based on single cell analysis confirmed by flow cytometry and pathology, the mechanism of action seems to be related or at least associated with an increase in f/480high peritoneal macrophages and a decrease in recruited macrophages, and to f/480high infiltration of the tumor. However, further studies are needed to confirm these observations. During IP tumor progression, Allocetra-OTS as a standalone therapy or in combination with ICI, or cisplatin, significantly reduced tumor size and resulted in complete remission in up to 100% treated mice. Similar results were obtained in ID8 ovary cancer. Based on excellent safety profile in > 50 patients treated in prior clinical trials for sepsis and Covid-19, Phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra-OTS plus chemotherapy has started and three patient already recruited. A second phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra- OTS plus anti-PD1, as a second- and third-line therapy in various cancers, was initiated in Q1 2023. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of RmNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of RmNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aims: To describe combined neural and muscular interventions in post covid exacerbations of cancer pain with disabilities.To present a new perspective of neuromyopathy to explain Intractable CA pancreas pain. Introduction: Additional challenges in cancer pain management are due to cancer treatment complications (chemotherapy, radiotherapy). CA Pancreas pains routinely addressed with oral neuromodulators, opioids neurolytic coeliac plexus block (NCPB) or splanchnic nerve radiofrequency ablation (SRF). 75 years male, CA pancreas with spine, pelvic bone metastasis, post chemotherapy radiotherapy. 6 months bedridden with post covid exacerbations in pain (vas 10/10) received prior painkillers. Started oral pregabalin 75mg od, ultracet bd, myospaz bd. Result(s): With 15 days medications vas 6/10, patient could sit on wheelchair. Given sciatico-femoral block, pain reduced vas 2/10 but recurred in 7 day vas 5/10. Started USGDN of tight back and lower limb muscles with 32G solid needles.post3 sessions vas 2/10, able to walk with support after 4 weeks. Discussion(s): Viscerosomatic convergence at the dorsal horn neurons produces visceral pain referred to back and abdominal muscles led to muscle spasm with generation of myofascial trigger points(MTrPs)and pain. USGDN addresses MTrPs. Needle insertion produces local twitch reflex (LTR) followed by muscle relaxation with pain relief. Neural interventions addresses only visceral nociceptive afferents from celiac plexus which forms 10% of total spinal cord afferent input which sensitizes peripheral and central motor nociceptive pathway processing neuromyopathy. Conclusion(s): Viscerosomatic convergence with muscles involvement (neuromyopathy) proved to be effectively managed by using combined approaches, neuromoduation and USGDN in Ca pancreas pain with disabilities.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background The pandemic has accelerated the introduction of more flexible and cost-effective treatment forms. The efficacy of trastuzumab in the intravenous (IV) and SC forms is similar both in early and advanced HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patients. Compared to IV administration, SC enables reduction of treatment costs and time, and saves equipment and human resources. SC formulation is more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers and may be implemented as a home-based therapy. Recently, systemic anticancer treatment (including chemotherapy) has been increasingly performed at home, improving patient comfort and reducing the burden on the healthcare system. Poland has already implemented home-based treatment with some biologic compounds;however, they have not included trastuzumab in BC patients. Objectives This RWE analysis aims to evaluate the organizational and therapeutic procedures related to the home-based treatment with SC trastuzumab and the attitudes of patients and healthcare providers to this approach. Material and methods The study enrolled early HER2(+) BC patients treated with trastuzumab during the COVID-19 pandemic. Monitoring and treatment duration were consistent with SmPC and reimbursement regulations in Poland. The first 3-6 doses of SC trastuzumab (alone or in combination with CHT) were administered at a cancer center in outpatient and inpatient settings. Subsequent doses were administered at home by 3 qualified breast nurses. Post-injection follow-up was used for educational purposes. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. The study was reviewed and approved by the local Bioethics Committee. Results The analysis included 20 patients treated in two comprehensive cancer centers in Poland with a median age of 59 years (range, 36-72 years). Seven patients (35%) were professionally active. The average distance from the place of residence to the cancer center was 24 km (range, 2-65 km). A total of 232 doses were administered (mean 11.6 doses per patient;range 6-14), 133 doses at home and 99 at the cancer center. The overall tolerance of trastuzumab was good and consistent with the known safety profile described in Summary of Product Characteristics. Only 1 patient (5%) discontinued treatment prematurely due to decreased LVEF;another 19 patients completed treatment as planned. For 19 patients (95%), the benefits of SC treatment included time savings, the ability to continue working, and avoiding crowded places and infection risk. 2 patients (10%) considered the nurse's visit privacy disturbing, while 18 (90%) would recommend home-based drug administration. The average duration of a nurse's stay at home was 60 minutes (range 30 to 130 minutes). No logistical or technical problems were reported, except for occasional patient lateness. Nurses positively assessed the treatment provided in the nursing office, which was a source of additional knowledge, and experience. The overall impression of home-based therapy was positive for both patients and nurses. The limitation of the study is the declarative nature of the data. Conclusions Home-based treatment with SC trastuzumab should be pursued due to its safety, ease of organization, positive perception by patients and nurses, and reducing healthcare system resources. It can be particularly valuable for disabled patients who have difficulty reaching the hospital and professionally active patients. Specialized, trained nurses can self-sufficiently carry out part of the prolonged trastuzumab treatment, reducing physician involvement.
ABSTRACT
Background: Residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early HER2- negative breast cancer (BC) remains an unmet medical need. However, no therapies to date have tested their activity directly in chemo-resistant RD. Here, we hypothesized that combining an oncolytic virus such as T-VEC with atezolizumab may offer clinical benefit in patients (pts) with RD after standard NAC. To our knowledge, PROMETEO is the first trial that examines the activity of immunotherapy in pts with RD prior to surgery. Method(s): PROMETEO (NCT03802604) is a singlearm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Women with triple-negative BC (TNBC) or hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with baseline (i.e., before NAC) ki67 >= 20% were eligible. RD was confirmed with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a tumor diameter >= 10 mm and a core-biopsy detecting the presence of invasive cells. Before surgery, T-VEC was administered intratumorally on week 1 (106 pfu/mL), then in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter (108 pfu/mL) for 4 injections. Atezolizumab (840 mg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 infusions, starting at week 4. Surgery was performed in < 3 weeks after completing the treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination, measured by the rate of residual cancer burden (RCB) class 0/1 at surgery. Tumor samples collected at 5 timepoints (before NAC, during screening period, after first dose of T-VEC, after first dose of T-VEC and atezolizumab and at surgery) were mandatory to assess gene expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), immune cells PD-L1 IHC (SP142), tumor mutational burden (TMB) by FoundationOne and other translational endpoints. Result(s): Between Dec 2018 to Feb 2022, 28 pts were enrolled: 20 pts with HR+/HER2- disease and 8 pts with TNBC. Median age was 47 (range 31-71) and 71% of pts were premenopausal. At diagnosis before NAC, clinical stage II disease represented 60.7%, cN+ 60.7%, median Ki-67 was 37.5% (range 20%-95%), high TILs (>=10%) 37%, median TMB was 3 (0-19) and only 1 of 27 pts (3.7%) had a PD-L1-positive tumor. After NAC, mean tumor size by MRI was 28.3 mm (10-93). Two pts discontinued from the trial (1 withdrawal of consent and 1 COVID infection). The completion of 5 cycles of treatment was achieved by 73% of pts. The overall RCB-0/1 rate was 25% (7 of 28, 95% IC 10.7 - 44.9%), all with RCB 0 (pathologic complete response [pCR]). The pCR rate was 30% in HR+/HER2- disease and 12.5 % in TNBC. Radiological response by MRI was achieved by 3 of 28 pts (10.7%). Interestingly, none of the 7 pts with a pCR had radiological response (stable disease n=5, progressive disease [PD] n=2). Six pts (21.4%) had radiological PD and had RCB 2/3. Overall, 27 (96%) patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade. Most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were fever (11 pts, 39.3%), ALT increased (9 pts, 32.1%), AST increased (8 pts, 28.6%), arthralgia (6 pts, 21.4%) and anemia (6 pts, 21.4%). Grade 3 reversible neutropenia occurred in 1 patient. Across all pts, significant increases (p< 0.001) in TILs, immune genes and immune PDL1+ cells were observed after 1 dose of TVEC, 1 dose of the combination and at surgery. Intrinsic subtype changes at surgery occurred in 73.1% of cases, mostly (46.1%) Luminal A/B converting to Normal-like. At surgery, 19 of 26 (73.1%) of tumors were PDL1+. Conclusion(s): Two months of T-VEC in combination with atezolizumab induced a pCR in a subgroup of pts with chemoresistant HER2- breast cancer. This effect is probably related to the immune activation provoked by the combined treatment. Interestingly, a high discrepancy was observed between the presurgical radiological imaging and the actual surgical pathological report. Pre-operative window-ofopportunity trials in this context might provide important clues regarding the activity of novel treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
Background: The approval of atezolizumab + bevacizumab for untreated advanced HCC was a significant benefit for patients, but with an increased risk of potentially severe bleeding complications. Tivozanib (a selective VEGFR 1, 2, & 3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) has been combined with durvalumab in the DEDUCTIVE study;preliminary results presented in January 2022 showed that this combination was well tolerated with comparable efficacy to other immune checkpoint and VEGF containing regimens in patients with previously untreated HCC (J Clin Oncol 40, no. 4 suppl 462-462). We now report the final results of this cohort (cohort A) of patients as well as those with previously treated HCC, including safety results for all the patients. Method(s): Major eligibility criteria included age .18 yrs with documented advanced HCC, Child-Pugh Class A, ECOG 0 or 1, and creatinine clearance .40 ml/min. Major exclusion criteria included co-infection with HBV and HCV and significant organ dysfunction. Patients were treated with 0.89 mg tivozanib p.o., 21 days on followed by 7 days off and 1500 mg durvalumab i.v. every 28 days. The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of this combination in patients with advanced HCC;secondary objectives included assessing objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival, and overall survival (OS). The study was amended in 2021 to include a cohort of patients previously treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (cohort B). Result(s): 21 patients were enrolled in cohort A and 6 in cohort B;the median age was 67, 88% of patients were male, and 24% were Asian. The median followup time was 13.2 mos and 3.4 mos for cohorts A and B, respectively. Data were available for 25 of the 27 patients enrolled. For cohort A, the ORR was 25% (5/20) and 1-year OS was 76%. For safety analysis, 24 (96%) patients had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE);92% were attributed possibly to either tivozanib or durvalumab;32% were serious TEAEs and there was 1 TEAE leading to death (unrelated). Of the 8 (32%) serious TEAE, 2 were coronavirus infection. 2 patients had serious (grade 3) treatment-related AEs: 1 pneumonitis and 1 with gastrointestinal hemorrhage and anemia. There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related AEs. Conclusion(s): Treatment with the combination of tivozanib and durvalumab in patients with either untreated advanced HCC or those previously treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab was well tolerated;no severe bleeding events occurred in this study. Efficacy outcomes were comparable to other IO-TKI combinations in HCC. Data for PDL1 status, HBV/HCV status was collected and will be presented along with final safety and efficacy results for both cohorts.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 vaccination recommendations for cancer patients (pts) are similar to the general population. The interaction between checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and Sars-COV-2 vaccines has been understudied. One potential complication in pts receiving CPI is the occurrence of immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs) resulting from overactivation of the immune system. This retrospective study examined the incidence of severe irAEs in pts with bladder urothelial cancer (UC) treated with CPI therapy who received concurrent vaccinations against Sars-CoV-2. Method(s): Following IRB approval, UC pts who received any approved CPI treatment since FDA authorization of the first COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020 were identified via institutional electronic health record. Pts who received 1 or more doses of an authorized vaccine within 60 days of CPI treatment were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the incidence of severe irAE (defined as one or more of the following: grade 3 AE or above, multi-system involvement, need for hospitalization). Secondary endpoints included time between CPI and vaccination, need for immunosuppressive therapy, and rate of discontinuation. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Result(s): Forty pts were included in our analysis with a median age of 72.5 years (IQR: 66.0-79.2);82% pts were male. At the time of vaccination, 37 pts (92.5%) received CPI monotherapy, 2 pts (5.0%) received combination (combo) CPI therapy, and 1 pt (2.5%) received combo platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI. The vaccine manufacturer was Pfizer Bio-NTech in 22 pts (55.0%), Moderna in 17 pts (42.5%), and Johnson and Johnson in 1 pt (2.5%). Number of vaccinations received was>/= 3 in 27 pts, 2 in 11 pts, and 1 in 2 pts. Six pts (15.0%) experienced severe irAEs following vaccination, including nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis, DKA, and infusion-related reaction. Rates of severe irAEs were 16.2% (6/37) with CPI monotherapy, no severe irAEs occurred in the combo CPI and combo CPI-chemo groups. Severe irAEs occurred after the first vaccine dose in 1 pt (16.7%), second dose in 3 pts (50.0%), and third dose in 2 pts (33.3%) pts. The median time between CPI treatment and vaccination in this group was 22.0 days (IQR: 15.8-36.5. Hospitalization was required for all 6 patients (100%). Three pts (50.0%) required immunosuppressive therapy with a median therapy duration of 64.0 days (IQR 47.0-83.5). Five pts (83.3%) discontinued CPI therapy following severe irAEs. Conclusion(s): In this retrospective study, we observed a 15% rate severe irAE in UC pts receiving CPI concurrently with COVID-19 vaccines. Further investigation in pts with additional cancer types is warranted to help determine best practice guidelines for COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients receiving CPI.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with HR- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC) with a low level of HER2 (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score 1+ or IHC 2+ and negative in situ hybridization [ISH]) have poor prognosis. Combining 1L chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors can modestly improve outcomes vs chemotherapy alone, but treatment benefit is largely seen in patients with PD-L1+ disease. BEGONIA (NCT03742102) is an ongoing 2-part, open-label platform study, evaluating safety and efficacy of D, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, combined with other novel therapies in 1L triple-negative a/mBC, including HR-, HER2-low disease. T-DXd is a trastuzumab-topoisomerase I inhibitor antibody-drug conjugate that improves survival in patients with previously treated HR-, HER2-low mBC (NCT03734029;Modi NEJM 2022). Here, we report updated results of the T-DXd + D combination from BEGONIA. Method(s): Patients with unresectable HR-, HER2-low (per local testing, IHC 2+/ISH-, IHC 1+/ISH-, or IHC 1+/ISH untested) a/mBC were enrolled in the T-DXd + D arm. Patients eligible for 1L treatment, regardless of PD-L1 status, received intravenous T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg + D 1120 mg every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. PD-L1, assessed using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay, was defined as high if >= 5% of the tumor area was populated by PDL1-expressing tumor or immune cells. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR;RECIST v1.1);progressionfree survival [PFS];and response duration. Patients included in the efficacy analysis had >= 2 ontreatment disease assessments, progressed, died, or withdrew from the study. Result(s): As of April 8, 2022, 56 patients received T-DXd + D (34 ongoing) and 46 were included in the efficacy analysis. Median (range) follow-up was 10.1 (0-22) months. Median age was 53.5 years, 71% had received prior treatment for early stage BC, and 64% had visceral metastases at baseline. Confirmed ORR was 26/46 (57% 95% CI, 41-71) and unconfirmed ORR was 33/54 (61% 95% CI, 47-74);1/46 patients (2%) had complete and 25/46 (54%) had partial responses. Confirmed response occurred irrespective of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 high ORR, 5/7 [71%];PD-L1 low, 13/21 [62%];PD-L1 missing, 8/18 [44%]). Median duration of response was not reached;however, 64% of patients remained in response at 12 month follow-up and 73% had an ongoing response at data cutoff. Median PFS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 8-not reached). Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the agents' known safety, with treatment-related AEs occurring in 49 patients (88%), any Grade 3/4 AEs in 18 patients (32%), and any serious AEs in 10 patients (18%). The most common all-Grade AEs were nausea (41 [73%]), fatigue (26 [46%]), and vomiting (17 [30%]). Adjudicated treatment-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred for 5 patients (9%), which were mostly Grade 1 or 2 and 1 case of Grade 5 associated with COVID pneumonia. Seven patients (13%) and 21 patients (38%) had T-DXd dose reduction and dose delay, respectively;22 (39%) had D dose delay. Seven patients (13%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. Conclusion(s): For patients with HR-, HER2-low a/mBC, T-DXd in combination with D in the 1L setting shows manageable safety and promising efficacy including durable responses and an encouraging PFS. Although subgroups were small, responses were observed irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Analysis of additional translational data is ongoing. Funding(s): AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo.
ABSTRACT
Case report - Introduction: This case highlights the dilemma of keeping rheumatoid arthritis disease under control in active cancer cases and establishing a consistent multidisciplinary dialogue during a pandemic and staffing crises. During chemotherapy and active cancer treatment, disease-modifying therapies (conventional and biologic) are often stopped. In some cases, the potential benefits versus risks of restarting usual therapies have to be balanced against risks of suppressing disease activity with highdose steroids. Risks of infection (common and atypical) need to be considered. Case report - Case description: A is a 67-year-old female nonsmoker diagnosed with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RF, anti - CCP positive) in 2008. Other conditions include type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation (on warfarin), hypothyroidism and obstructive sleep apnoea. Due to active disease, despite triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine), anti-TNF therapy (etanercept) commenced in 2009 with primary non-response. However, she responded well to B-cell therapy (rituximab) in conjunction with oral methotrexate (25mg weekly) receiving annual infusions from 2010 to 2016. In 2017, an elective sleeve gastrectomy procedure for high BMI was abandoned after peritoneal deposits of concern were noted. Histology and CT imaging were consistent with a primary peritoneal malignancy (Stage 3c low-grade serous adenocarcinoma). Treatment involved debulking surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpinoophorectomy, omentectomy) and tamoxifen. Treatment for rheumatoid arthritis stalled during this period but as frequent steroids were required for active joint inflammation, in agreement with the oncologists, she had a rituximab cycle in 2018. Unfortunately, in 2019 she had signs of cancer progression (elevated tumour markers, CT imaging) and has subsequently started carboplatin chemotherapy. She has been unable to continue methotrexate or rituximab pending completion of the chemotherapy cycles (ongoing). However, her arthritis is now uncontrolled without increased steroids. Due to recurrent flares, her maintenance dose has been increased from 5mg to 7.5-10mg prednisolone daily until we can establish if it is safe and appropriate to recommence her usual arthritis regime. Even without disease-modifying therapy like methotrexate and rituximab, risk of infection (including atypical ones) is still significant with the combination of chemotherapy and steroids. Risk of progressive joint damage and adverse quality of life with active arthritis also needs to be considered. Staffing crises, exacerbated by COVID pandemic issues, have added to complexity of decision making and coordination of regular multidisciplinary discussions regarding treatment. Case report - Discussion: Cancer is a known association in rheumatoid arthritis patients with a twofold higher risk of lymphoma compared to the general population. Whether condition or treatment affects risk remains unclear as immune dysregulation is relevant in both autoimmunity and cancer. Paraneoplastic, recent onset arthritis, chemotherapy- or immunotherapy-induced arthralgia/arthritis are also well documented. This case had a seropositive rheumatoid arthritis phenotype quite a few years prior to cancer diagnosis. Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon, often presenting as in this case as an incidental finding. It is usually treated like ovarian cancer Whilst methotrexate has been implicated in lung cancer, melanoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, overall safety data suggest any risk is quite low (e.g., EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders usually resolve with drug discontinuation). It is also a known chemotherapeutic agent. Anti-TNF treatment algorithms generally exclude patients with recent cancer. Rituximab, originally developed as a cancer drug, is not thought to affect risk of cancer development or progression. Treatment with disease-modifying therapy (conventional and biologics) is often withheld in patients with active malignancy undergoing chemotherapy due to a theo etical risk of potentiated immunosuppression and toxicity, particularly cytopaenias. However, maintaining arthritis control with glucocorticoids also has short- and long-term risks. Combining chemotherapy agents like carboplatin with methotrexate has been used for urothelial carcinoma and can be well tolerated with close monitoring of haematological parameters. Thus, it could be argued this patient is at risk of infections whichever treatment approach is taken and regaining control of arthritis with recommencement of methotrexate and rituximab is much better for her quality of life. Regular multidisciplinary discussions are important to outline risks versus benefits of combined treatment. This may be difficult in practice during staffing crises. Covid risk in patients receiving rituximab and/or chemotherapy, timing and response to COVID vaccination are also important considerations. Case report - Key learning points: . Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon and can present as an incidental finding . Whilst treatment for progressive cancer is important, withholding rheumatoid arthritis treatment can have a significant adverse impact on quality of life . Morbidity and mortality risks of stopping treatment versus combined treatment (cancer therapy and disease-modifying therapy) ideally needs to be fully discussed and agreed with the patient and all care providers - lack of "named" providers, restructuring, redeployment, multi-specialty care and a global pandemic can make coordination of this difficult.
ABSTRACT
Case report - Introduction: This case highlights the dilemma of keeping rheumatoid arthritis disease under control in active cancer cases and establishing a consistent multidisciplinary dialogue during a pandemic and staffing crises. During chemotherapy and active cancer treatment, disease-modifying therapies (conventional and biologic) are often stopped. In some cases, the potential benefits versus risks of restarting usual therapies have to be balanced against risks of suppressing disease activity with highdose steroids. Risks of infection (common and atypical) need to be considered. Case report - Case description: A is a 67-year-old female nonsmoker diagnosed with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RF, anti - CCP positive) in 2008. Other conditions include type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation (on warfarin), hypothyroidism and obstructive sleep apnoea. Due to active disease, despite triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine), anti-TNF therapy (etanercept) commenced in 2009 with primary non-response. However, she responded well to B-cell therapy (rituximab) in conjunction with oral methotrexate (25mg weekly) receiving annual infusions from 2010 to 2016. In 2017, an elective sleeve gastrectomy procedure for high BMI was abandoned after peritoneal deposits of concern were noted. Histology and CT imaging were consistent with a primary peritoneal malignancy (Stage 3c low-grade serous adenocarcinoma). Treatment involved debulking surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpinoophorectomy, omentectomy) and tamoxifen. Treatment for rheumatoid arthritis stalled during this period but as frequent steroids were required for active joint inflammation, in agreement with the oncologists, she had a rituximab cycle in 2018. Unfortunately, in 2019 she had signs of cancer progression (elevated tumour markers, CT imaging) and has subsequently started carboplatin chemotherapy. She has been unable to continue methotrexate or rituximab pending completion of the chemotherapy cycles (ongoing). However, her arthritis is now uncontrolled without increased steroids. Due to recurrent flares, her maintenance dose has been increased from 5mg to 7.5-10mg prednisolone daily until we can establish if it is safe and appropriate to recommence her usual arthritis regime. Even without disease-modifying therapy like methotrexate and rituximab, risk of infection (including atypical ones) is still significant with the combination of chemotherapy and steroids. Risk of progressive joint damage and adverse quality of life with active arthritis also needs to be considered. Staffing crises, exacerbated by COVID pandemic issues, have added to complexity of decision making and coordination of regular multidisciplinary discussions regarding treatment. Case report - Discussion: Cancer is a known association in rheumatoid arthritis patients with a twofold higher risk of lymphoma compared to the general population. Whether condition or treatment affects risk remains unclear as immune dysregulation is relevant in both autoimmunity and cancer. Paraneoplastic, recent onset arthritis, chemotherapy- or immunotherapy-induced arthralgia/arthritis are also well documented. This case had a seropositive rheumatoid arthritis phenotype quite a few years prior to cancer diagnosis. Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon, often presenting as in this case as an incidental finding. It is usually treated like ovarian cancer Whilst methotrexate has been implicated in lung cancer, melanoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, overall safety data suggest any risk is quite low (e.g., EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders usually resolve with drug discontinuation). It is also a known chemotherapeutic agent. Anti-TNF treatment algorithms generally exclude patients with recent cancer. Rituximab, originally developed as a cancer drug, is not thought to affect risk of cancer development or progression. Treatment with disease-modifying therapy (conventional and biologics) is often withheld in patients with active malignancy undergoing chemotherapy due to a theo etical risk of potentiated immunosuppression and toxicity, particularly cytopaenias. However, maintaining arthritis control with glucocorticoids also has short- and long-term risks. Combining chemotherapy agents like carboplatin with methotrexate has been used for urothelial carcinoma and can be well tolerated with close monitoring of haematological parameters. Thus, it could be argued this patient is at risk of infections whichever treatment approach is taken and regaining control of arthritis with recommencement of methotrexate and rituximab is much better for her quality of life. Regular multidisciplinary discussions are important to outline risks versus benefits of combined treatment. This may be difficult in practice during staffing crises. Covid risk in patients receiving rituximab and/or chemotherapy, timing and response to COVID vaccination are also important considerations. Case report - Key learning points: . Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon and can present as an incidental finding . Whilst treatment for progressive cancer is important, withholding rheumatoid arthritis treatment can have a significant adverse impact on quality of life . Morbidity and mortality risks of stopping treatment versus combined treatment (cancer therapy and disease-modifying therapy) ideally needs to be fully discussed and agreed with the patient and all care providers - lack of "named" providers, restructuring, redeployment, multi-specialty care and a global pandemic can make coordination of this difficult.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite advances in the treatment of mCRC combining chemotherapy regimens with biologics, most patients (pts) still progress within 11 months of receiving 1L chemotherapy. Addition of novel therapies to the standard of care (SoC) to improve antitumor activity is urgently needed. The randomized part 2 of COLUMBIA-1 (NCT04068610) evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining SoC (bevacizumab [BEV] + FOLFOX) with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (D) and the anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody oleclumab (O). Method(s): Pts with previously untreated, MSS-mCRC and ECOG PS <=1 received either SoC alone or SoC + D (1500 mg, Q4W) + O (3000 mg Q2W x4 then Q4W) in the experimental arm (EXP). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per investigator assessed RECIST v1.1. Result(s): As of 10 Dec 2021, 52 pts were enrolled, of whom 51 were response evaluable. The confirmed ORR with SoC was 44.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.4-65.1%) compared to 61.5% (95% CI, 40.6-79.8%) in the EXP arm. Median OS was not reached (SoC) vs 19.1 mos (EXP);median PFS was 11.1 mos (SoC) vs 10.9 mos (EXP;Table). Grade >=3 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 76.9% of pts in SoC and 65.4% EXP. Fatal TEAEs (all unrelated) were observed in 3 pts in the EXP arm: 1 with sepsis and 2 with intestinal perforation. One pt with intestinal perforation deemed related to BEV experienced fatal peritonitis. In the SoC arm, there was a single fatal COVID-19 TEAE. The most frequent treatment-related AEs in the EXP arm were diarrhea (38.5%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (38.5%) and fatigue (26.9%). There was no identified association between CD73 expression and clinical benefit. Conclusion(s): Addition of D + O to FOLFOX + BEV SoC showed a moderate response increase without PFS benefit vs SoC alone. Safety was consistent with known safety profiles. [Formula presented] Clinical trial identification: NCT04068610. Editorial acknowledgement: Editing support for this , under the direction of the authors, was provided by Catherine Crookes of Ashfield MedComms (Macclesfield, UK), an Inizio company, and was funded by AstraZeneca. Legal entity responsible for the study: AstraZeneca. Funding(s): AstraZeneca. Disclosure: N.H. Segal: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Immunocore, PsiOxus, Roche/Genentech, BI, Revitope, ABL Bio, Novartis, GSK, AstraZeneca, Numab;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Regeneron, Immunocore, PureTech, AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech. J. Tie: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Honorarium: Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pierre Fabre;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Haystack Oncology, Amgen, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pierre Fabre, BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis. S. Kopetz: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: MolecularMatch, Lutris, Iylon;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Sanofi, Biocartis, Guardant Health, Array BioPharma, Genentech/Roche, EMD Serono, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Other: Genetech, EMD Serono, Merck, Holy Stone, Novartis, Lilly, BI, Boston Biomedical, AstraZeneca, Bayer Health, Pierre Fabre, Redx Pharma, Ipsen, Daiichi Sankyo, Natera, HalioDx, Lutris, Jacobio, Pfizer, Repare Therapeutics, Inivata, GSK, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Iylon, Xilis, AbbVie, Amal Therapeutics, Gilead, Mirati, Flame Biosciences, Servier, Carina Biotechnology, Bicara Therapeutics, Endeavor BioMedicines, Numab Pharma, Johnson and Johnson/Janssen. M.P. Ducreux: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Beigene, MSD, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Terumo, Roche, Merck Serono, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Sotio;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Keocyt, Roche, Bayer. E. Chen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Princip l Investigator: AstraZeneca. R. Dienstmann: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Roche, BI, Ipsen, Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, Libbs, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Lilly, AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, BI;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Merck, Pierre Fabre. A. Hollebecque: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Incyte, EISAI;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Basilea, Tahio, Relay Theraeutics, QED Therapeutics, Debiopharm;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Incyte;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, M19-345: AbbVie;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, CO42216: Roche;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, MCLA-158: Merus;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, SGNB6A: Seattle Genetics;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, TAS-120-202: Tahio;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, Krystal-10: Mirati;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, ADP-0033: Adaptimmune;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, ACT16902: Sanofi;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, C4201002: Pfizer;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, RLY-4008: Relay Therapeutics;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, CC-90011: Celgene/BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, Loxo-IDH: Loxo/Lilly;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca. M. Reilley: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Helsinn, ZielBio. M.E. Elez Fernandez: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Organon;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bayer, F. Hoffman La Roche, Merck Serono, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Servier;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BI, BMS, Celgene, Debiopharm International SA, F. Hoffman La Roche, Genentech, HalioDX SAS, Hutchinson MediPharma International, Janssen-Cilag SA, Menarini, Merck ealth KgaA, MSD, Merus NV, Mirati, Novartis Farmaceutica SA, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Sanofi Aventis Recherche & Developpement, Servier, Taiho Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, ASCO Scientific Program Committee: Developmental Therapeutics - Immunotherapy: ASCO;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Speaker of the ESMO Academy: ESMO;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Coordinator of the SEOM +MIR Section of Residents and Young Assistants: SEOM;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, accommodations, expenses: Amgen, Array BioPharma, BMS, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. J. Cosaert: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Member: AstraZeneca. J. Cain: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca. M. Hernandez: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. N. Hewson: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca. Z.A. Cooper: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. M. Dressman: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. J. Tabernero: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BI, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Ikena Oncology, Inspirna Inc, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Ona Therapeutics, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Scandio Oncology, Scorpion Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Sotio Biotech, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics, TheraMyc;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Oniria Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, educational collaboration: Imedex/HMP, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, Physicians Education Resource (PER). Copyright © 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology
ABSTRACT
Introduction Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an aggressive and potential life-threatening syndrome characterized by excessive immune activation and cytokine release. In adults, infections, inflammatory diseases and more rarely hematological malignancies can trigger the onset of HLH. We describe a rare case of intravascular diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) associated with HLH. Case presentation A 53-year-old woman, presenting with high fever since 3 weeks and asthenia, was admitted to the hospital. She had a negative medical and travel history. On physical examination, generalized edema and hypotension were noted. An extensive bacterial and viral work-up (including COVID-19) was negative. During admission, the patient developed progressive anasarca and an episode of epileptic convulsions. Laboratory results showed increasing cytopenia, major hyperferritinemia, hypofibrinogenemia and hypertriglyceridemia. A bone marrow examination showed prominent hemophagocytosis. Cerebrospinal fluid examination showed the presence of aberrant monocytes, indicating CNS involvement. Genetic analysis to detect hemophagocytosis-associated mutations was negative. PET-CT revealed increased FDG uptake in both adrenal glands, hypophysis, bone marrow and spleen. Biopsy of the adrenal gland was not contributive. Brain MRI showed two cerebral masses radiologically suggestive for meningioma, confirmed by histology. The patient was refractory to high-dose corticotherapy and treatment was adapted to the HLH-94 protocol. A blind skin biopsy showed the presence of a population of pathological B-lymphocytes with aberrant immunophenotype (CD20+/Pax5+/Bcl6+/Bcl2+/cMYC-) in and around the small blood vessels leading to the diagnosis of intravascular DLBCL. Treatment was adjusted to lymphoma-specific immune-chemotherapy upon which a gradual clinical improvement was noted. After four cycles R-CHOP, three cycles of high dose methotrexate and high dose Endoxan for stem cell mobilisation, treatment was intensified with two cycles R-DHAP because of laboratory signs of persistent hemophagocytosis. Thereafter, the patient received an autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) after BEAM chemotherapy. End of treatment PET-CT and skin biopsy documented complete remission of the lymphoma. Because of slow hematological recovery, repeated bone marrow examinations were done and showed hypoplasia and persistent hemophagocytosis. Dexamethasone in combination with eltrombopag led to a gradual hematological response. At 20 months after auto-HCT, the patients stay in complete remission of the DLBCL and are independent of corticotherapy, with acceptable hematological parameters and no clinical signs of HLH. Discussion In the absence of infection, HLH is a diagnostic challenge frequently leading to delayed identification of the primary trigger, if any. A characteristic image on PET-CT with increased uptake in adrenal glands and hypophysisis led us to perform a blind skin biopsy to diagnose intravascular DLBCL, a rare subtype of lymphoma. Our case also shows that 1) HLH is very difficult to manage without dealing with the primary trigger and 2) HLH can persist for prolonged periods of time after successful treatment of the primary cause and may require specific therapy for sufficient control.
ABSTRACT
Background: Dacomitinib is a second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved as first-line therapy in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC. In the phase 3 ARCHER 1050 trial, PFS and OS were improved with dacomitinib compared to gefitinib. However, patients (pts) with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (mets) were ineligible to enroll into the study. ATORG-003 is an ongoing investigator-initiated single-arm phase 2 trial evaluating a dose titration strategy to improve the safety and tolerability of dacomitinib whilst maintaining efficacy. The intracranial activity of dacomitinib was evaluated in a prespecified subgroup analysis. Method(s): ATORG-003 (9 sites, 5 Asian countries) is enrolling newly diagnosed stage IIIB-IV NSCLC pts with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion [ex19del] or L858R). Pts receive dacomitinib 30 mg orally once daily for one cycle (4 weeks [wks]), after which pts with grade <=1 toxicity may escalate to 45 mg once daily (investigator/pt decision). A 24 pt subgroup with asymptomatic/controlled CNS mets completed enrollment in Jun2021. CNS mets were assessed by MRI scan at baseline and every 8 wks for 18 months (mo), then every 12 wks with MRI/CT. Key study secondary endpoints include intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial progression free survival (iPFS). Analyses were based on 7Jun2022 data cutoff date (median 18.7 mo follow-up). Result(s): Of 24 pts with CNS mets, median age was 65 years (range 33-78), ECOG PS 0/1 in 17%/83% and ex19del/L858R/both in 50%/46%/4%. 8/24 (33%) pts had prior intracranial radiotherapy. 2/24 pts dose escalated to 45 mg once daily after Cycle 1. There was measurable (>=10 mm target lesion) CNS mets in 9/24 (38%) pts. The iORR was 67% (1 intracranial CR [iCR], 5 intracranial PR), and median intracranial duration of response (iDoR) was not reached (NR). In 14 pts with non-measurable CNS mets only, iCR was seen in 6 (43%) pts. Median iPFS was NR with only n=5 CNS progression events in the entire cohort and n=7 remain on treatment. Overall (intra and extracranial) ORR was 67% and PFS rate at 12 mo was 42%. Conclusion(s): Dacomitinib has significant intracranial activity with observed durable responses in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC with CNS mets. Clinical trial identification: NCT04027647. Legal entity responsible for the study: Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG). Funding(s): Pfizer. Disclosure: A. Tan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Pfizer, Bayer. D. Kim: Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Astrazeneca/Medimmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Bridge BioTherapeutics, Chong Keun Dang, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Hanmi, Janssen, Merck, Merus, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, ONO Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, TP Therapeutics, Xcovery, Yuhan;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: InnoN, Asia Thoracic Oncology Research Group;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS/ONO Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Oncobix, Pfizer, SK Biopharm, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Scientific advisor for Health insurance review and assessment service, Korea;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Korean Association for Lung Cancer, Korean Cancer Association, Korean Society of Medical Oncology. T. Baisamut (Reungwetwattana): Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, and speaker: Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Novartis, BMS, Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Yuhan;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Astrazeneca, Roche, Novartis, MSD. L. Yueh Ni: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Panel of Discussion for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Board Meeting for early breast cancer management in our current practice.: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A multicentre, open-label, single-arm, lecular profiling study of patient with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with Osimertinib: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A Phase 3 Double-blinded, Two-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy in Participants with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Complete Radiological Response after Surgical Resection or Local Ablation (KEYNOTE-937): MSD;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lazertinib versus Gefitinib as the First-line Treatment in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Sensitizing Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: YUHAN;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A phase II randomized study of the combination of Ribociclib plus goserelin acetate with Hormonal Therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in premenopausal or perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer - RIGHT Choice Study: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A Global, Randomized, Phase 3, Open-Label Study of REGN2810 (Anti-PD-1 Antibody) versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced or Metastatic PD-L1+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Regeneron;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A Phase 3 study to Evaluate Zimberelimab (AB122) Monotherapy Compared to Standard Chemotherapy or Zimberelimab Combined with AB 154 in Front-Line, PD-L1 Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Arcus;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Interventional Genomic Profiling Study in Subjects with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) using Foundation Medicine: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Research Title: A Phase 3, randomize, double-blind trial of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) with or without lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) in participants with treatment naiv , metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have a tumor proportion score (TPS) greater than or equal to 1% (LEAP-007): MSD. G.F. Ho: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Chairperson: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: EliLily, Regeneron, Merck & Co., Inc., AB Science, Astellas, Tessa Therapeutics, Roche, Arcus Bioscience, AstraZeneca, Pfizer;Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples: Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. L.M. Tho: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Pfizer. N. Prasongsook: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche (Thailand), Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca. T.S.K. Mok: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AbbVie, ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Fishawack Facilitate, InMed Medical Communication, Lunit USA, Inc., Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, MD Health, Medscape/WebMD, PeerVoice, Permanyer SL, Prime Oncology, Research to Practice, Touch Medical Media, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, PER, Daz Group, Janssen Pharmaceutical NV, Jiahui Holdings Co., LiangYiHui Healthcare, Lucence Health Inc., Merck Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd., MiRXES, Novartis, OrigiMed Co. Ltd., Pfizer, Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting Co., Ltd., Taih harmaceutical Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Blueprint Medicines, Berry Oncology, CStone Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Fishawack Facilitate, Eisai, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, G1 Therapeutics, Hengrui, Ignyta, IQVIA, Incyte Corporation, Inivata, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Qiming Dev., Lunit USA, Inc., Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, Mirati Therapeutics, MoreHealth, Novartis, OrigiMed, Puma Tech., Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, Virtus Medical, Yuhan, Curio Science, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Covidien LP, C4 Therapeutics, Cirina Ltd., Da Volterrra, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Lucence Health Inc., Medscape LLC / WebMD, MiRXES, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, SFJ Pharmaceutical Ltd., Synergy Research, Tigermed, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Berry Oncology, D3 Bio Ltd., Lakeshore Biotech;Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, Chairman: ACT Genomics-Sanomics Group;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Former known as Hutchison Chi-Med: HutchMed;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Sanomics Ltd., Biolidics Ltd., Aurora Tele-Oncology, AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Former known as Hutchison Chi-Med: HutchMed;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, For clinical trials performed at CUHK: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, XCovery, Takeda, G1 Therapeutics, Clovis Oncology;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: geneDecode;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Aurora Tele-Oncology, Lunit USA, Inc., Sanomics Ltd.;Non-Financial Interests,Personal, Leadership Role, Term ended on 30 June 2022: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO);Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG), Chinese Lung Cancer Research Foundation Limited (CLCRF), Hong Kong Cancer Fund (HKCF), Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society (HKCTS), St. Stephen's College & Prep. School (Hong Kong);Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Term ended: Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO);Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Term ended on 30 April 2019: International Association for he Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). D.S.W. Tan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Novartis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Eli-Lilly, Loxo, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, Amgen. H.H.F. Loong: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli-Lilly, Illumina, Bayer, Guardant Health;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: CAN is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proinflammatory IL-1beta-driven pathways that may play a role in tumor growth in early-stage NSCLC. Preclinical data suggest targeting IL-1beta could decrease inflammation and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Method(s): CANOPY-N (NCT03968419) is a phase II, randomized, open-label study of neoadjuvant CAN, PEM or CAN+PEM in resectable NSCLC. Eligibility: Stage IB-IIIA NSCLC;treatment (tx) naive;ECOG PS 0-1;and eligible for planned resection 4-6 weeks after first dose. Pts were randomized 2:2:1 to the tx arms: CAN, CAN+PEM or PEM. CAN and PEM were both given as two 200 mg doses once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint: major pathological response (MPR) rate based on central review. Key secondary endpoints: overall response rate (ORR), surgical feasibility rate, and safety. Changes in CD8+ T cell, tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) and regulatory T cell (Treg) levels, among others, were assessed in exploratory biomarker analyses. Result(s): 88 pts enrolled across 3 arms: CAN (n=35), CAN+PEM (n=35) and PEM (n=18). 87 pts completed planned neoadjuvant tx. Four pts did not have surgery: 3 due to disease progression (CAN) and 1 to pt decision (CAN+PEM). MPR rates were 2.9% (CAN), 17.1% (CAN+PEM) and 11.1% (PEM). ORRs were 0% (CAN), 8.6% (CAN+PEM) and 11.1% (PEM). Gr >=3 AEs occurred in 37.1%, 28.6% and 22.2% of pts, of which 0%, 11.4% and 11.1% were tx related, in the CAN, CAN+PEM and PEM arms, respectively. Decreases in TAMs and Tregs were seen in CAN arms whereas increases in CD8+ T cells were seen in PEM arms. Modulations were more pronounced with CAN+PEM (Table). [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): CANOPY-N did not meet the primary endpoint of MPR rate, with minimal clinical efficacy and no increase in CD8+ T cells with CAN alone. No new safety signals were seen. IL-1beta inhibition impacted inflammation and immunosuppression in the TME. Clinical trial identification: CACZ885V2201C / NCT03968419. Editorial acknowledgement: Editorial assistance was provided by Ollie Butlin, MSc of Articulate Science Ltd., and was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Legal entity responsible for the study: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Funding(s): Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Disclosure: T.S.K. Mok: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AbbVie, ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Fishawack Facilitate, InMed Medical Communication, Lunit USA, Inc., Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, MD Health, Medscape/WebMD, PeerVoice, Touch Medical Media, Permanyer SL, Prime Oncology, Research to Practice, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, PER, Daz Group, Lucence Health Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutical NV, Jiahui Holdings Co., LiangYiHui Healthcare, Merck Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd, MiRXES, Novartis, OrigiMed Co. Ltd., Pfizer, Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Blueprint Medicines, Berry Oncology, CStone Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Fishawack Facilitate, Eisai, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, G1 Therapeutics, Hengrui, Ignyta, IQVIA, Incyte Corporation, Inivata, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Qiming Dev., Lunit USA, Inc., Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, Mirati Therapeutics, MoreHealth, Novartis, OrigiMed, Puma Tech., Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, Virtus Medical, Yuhan, Curio Science, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Covidien LP, C4 Therapeutics, Cirina Ltd., Da Volterrra, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd / Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Lucence Health Inc., Medscape LLC / WebMD, MiRXES, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, SFJ Pharmaceutical Ltd., Synergy Research, Tigermed, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Berry Oncology, D3 Bio Ltd., Lakeshore Biotech;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Former known as Hutchison Chi-Med: HutchMed;F nancial Interests, Personal, Officer, Chairman: ACT Genomics-Sanomics Group;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Sanomics Ltd., Biolidics Ltd., Aurora Tele-Oncology, AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Former known as Hutchison Chi-Med: HutchMed;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, For clinical trials performed at CUHK: Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, XCovery, Takeda, G1 Therapeutics, Clovis Oncology;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: geneDecode;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Aurora Tele-Oncology, Lunit USA, Inc., Sanomics Ltd.;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Term ended on 30 June 2022: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO);Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG), Chinese Lung Cancer Research Foundation Limited (CLCRF), Hong Kong Cancer Fund (HKCF), Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society (HKCTS), St. Stephen's College & Prep. School (Hong Kong);Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Term ended: Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO);Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Term ended on 30 April 2019: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). M. Tsuboi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Lecture: Johnson & Johnson Japan;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Lectures, Advisory boards: AstraZeneca KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical CO.,LTD, MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Lectures: Eli Lilly Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb KK, Teijin Pharma, Taiho Pharma, Medtronic Japan, ONO Pharmaceutical CO.,LTD;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory boards: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Daiichi-Sankyo company limited, MSD, AstraZeneca, Novartis;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Beohringer-Ingelheim Japan, MSD, AstraZeneca KK, Ono Pharmaceutical CO.,LTD, Bristol Myers Squibb KK, Novartis;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly Japan. J.M. Lee: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Astrazeneca, Roche/Genentech, Novartis;Financial nterests, Personal, Invited Speaker, LCMC3, LCMC4, NAUTIKA-1: Roche/Genentech;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, CANOPY-N, GEOMETRY-1: Novartis. E.S. Kim: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting/Research: Regeneron, Takeda, Novartis. J. Zhang: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biodesix, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Daiichi Sankyo, Hengrui Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Mirati, Nexus Health, Novartis, Novocure, Sanofi, Takeda Oncology;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MJH Life Sciences, Regeneron, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI and Sponsor: AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Nilogen, Genentech;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Hengrui Therapeutics, Mirati, Novartis, Abbvie, BeiGene, Merck;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, PI, basic science research: Mirati;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member, American Society of Clinical Oncology: ASCO;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member, American Association for Cancer Research: AACR;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer: IASLC;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member, Chinese American Hematologist and Oncologist Network: CAHON. J. Duan: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. C. Lobetti-Bodoni: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Clinical Development Medical Director: Novartis Oncology;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis Oncology;Other, Personal, Other, My husband is a Roche employer: Roche;Other, Personal, Other, My husband had consultancy in the last two years with these companies: Sanofi and Takeda;Other, Personal, Other, My husband ha honoraria in the last 2 years with these companies: Takeda, Jansenn-Cilag Ltd;Other, Personal, Other, My husband owns stock of this company: Harlock Helatcare Consulting Ltd. J.C. Brase: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis. A. Savchenko: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis. P. Garrido Lopez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Novartis, IO Biotech;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Spouse: Boehringer Ingelheim, Gebro, Janssen, Nordic;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Spouse: Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Data monitoring committee for a clinical trial in 2020: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Lung Cancer Medical Education TASC Committee 2021: Janssen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Blue print, Apollomics, Amgen, Array Biopharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, study entitled JNJ-372: Janssen;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Council member as Women for Oncology Committee ChairFellowship and Award Committee and Press CommitteeFaculty for lung and other thoracic tumours: ESMO;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, President of the Spanish Federation of Medical Societies (FACME): FACME;Other, Personal, Other, My son is working in the pharma company TEVA as an engineer. I do not have any kind ofrelationship with TEVA: TEVA;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Former President of Spanish Medical Oncology SocietyMember of the Spanish National Health Advisory Board: SEOM;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Member of the Scientific Committee of the Spanish Against Cancer Research Foundation (aecc) and also Borad member: AECC;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, IASLC Women in Tho acic Oncology Working Group Member: IASLC. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolutionized solid tumor treatment, however, in many tumors only partial response is achieved. Allocetra-OTS has an immune modulating effect on macrophages1 and showed an excellent safety profile in patients including patients with sepsis.2 Here we investigated the anti-tumoral effect of Allocetra-OTS cellular therapy, in solid tumor animal models. Methods Allocetra-OTS is manufactured from enriched mononuclear fractions and induced to undergo early apoptosis. In an immunecompetent model, Balb/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally (IP) with AB12 (mesothelioma) with pLenti-PGK-V5-Luc-Neo and treated with anti-CTLA4 with or without Allocetra-OTS. Mice were monitored daily for clinical score and weekly using IVIS. Kaplan-Meier log rank test was done for survival. For Allocetra-OTS preparation, enriched mononuclear fractions were collected by leukapheresis from healthy eligible human donors and induced to undergo early apoptosis.To follow tumor growth in vivo, HeLa-CD19 cells were stably transduced with pLenti-PGK-V5-Luc-Neo. For CAR preparation, fresh mononuclear cells (MNC) were transfected with CD19-CAR plasmids. SCID-Bg mice were injected IP with human HeLa-CD19 or HeLa-CD19-luciferase cells, 10x10 allocetraOTS or vehicle, and 10x10 CD19-CAR T cells or mock T cells. Results In immune competent Balb/c mesothelioma model, anti-CTLA4 standalone therapy significantly improved survival from mean 34+/-9 to 44.9 +/-20 days (p<0.05). Similarly, Allocetra- OTS standalone therapy improved survival to 52.3 +/-20 days (p<0.02). However, anti-CTLA4 + Allocetra-OTS combination therapy, ameliorated survival to 86.7+/-20 days (p<0.0001) with complete cancer remission in 60-100% of mice (figure 1 & 2). Similar anti-tumoral effects of Allocetra- OTS were seen in mesothelioma model in a combination therapy with either anti-PD1 or cisplatin. In the CAR-T model, SCID-Bg mice were sacrificed or died from tumor progression in 30+/-5 days (range 27-37). CAR T cell therapy significantly improved survival to 55+/-11 days (p < 0.05 vs MOCK) but Alloctra-OTS further improved survival to 75+/-10 (p < 0.001) with 20-40% complete remission. Conclusions During IP tumor progression, Allocetra-OTS as a standalone therapy or in combination with ICI, cisplatin or CAR-T therapy, significantly reduced tumor size and resulted in complete remission in up to100% treated mice. Based on excellent safety profile in > 40 patients treated in prior clinical trials for sepsis and Covid-19, Phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra-OTS plus chemotherapy has started and first patient already recruited. A second Phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra-OTS plus anti-PD1, as a second- and third-line therapy in various cancers, is planned for Q4 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite of the administration of multiple doses of vaccines (vax), cancer patients (pts) are a group at high risk of COVID-19 complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors associated with the humoral response to the 3rd dose (D) of mRNA-based vax in cancer pts during or after active treatment. Patients and Methods: Single institution, prospective study conducted at the L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, between 5/2021-4/2022. 30 days after the 2nd and 30 days after the 3rdD of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 (selected based on local pharmacy availability), seric levels of 3 antibodies (Ab) were measured in solid tumors pts during or after the active treatment, by a fluorescence bead-based assay. Anti-S and anti-RBD IgG to determine the humoral response to vax, anti-N IgG to identify a previous exposure to SARS-Cov-2. Primary objective: to assess the seroconversion (SC) rate and the Ab titres after 3rdD. Secondary Objectives: to detect any relation between the 3rdD response and pre-defined pts variables;to evaluate the humoral response to 3rdD in pts not responding to the 2ndD. Result(s): 99 of 110 pts were evaluated: 67.7% female, median age 63 ys, 49.5% breast cancer, 67.7% advanced stage. Active treatment: 40.4% biologic agent, 23% chemotherapy (alone or combination), 11.1% hormone. 3rdD vax type: 74.8% BNT162b2, 25.2% mRNA-1273. SC after 3rdD was obtained in 99% of pts. The use of GCSF was associated with a lower amount of anti-RBD IgG (p=0.03). A 6 vs 5 months interval between 2nd and 3rdD was correlated with higher anti-S IgG level (p<0.001). The heterologous vax regimen was associated with higher rate of anti-S IgG (p=0.04), especially the sequence mRNA- 1273 x 2 -> BNT162b2 (p=0.001). No significant correlation at the multivariate analyses was found between Ab levels and the other variables tested (age, BMI, cancer type, tumor stage, use of steroids, previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2, anti-cancer therapy, neutropenic potential of the therapy). 21/22 pts not responding to the 2ndD obtained SC after 3rdD. Conclusion(s): 3rdD of anti-COVID-19 vax is effective in cancer pts with solid tumors undergoing or after recent treatment. In this group the 3rdD oversteps all the negative influence of the factors related to the 2ndD vax failure, achieving the same response of the healthy population and demonstrating efficacy in not previously responders, too. The better performance of the heterologous vax regimen could be due to an exposition to a wider range of epitopes.
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Systemic Diseases Causing Pulmonary Havoc SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/18/2022 10:15 am - 11:10 am INTRODUCTION: Choriocarcinoma is the most common type of gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (GTN) and can occur in association with any pregnancy [1]. The main risk factors are advanced or very young maternal age, ethnicity, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, and prior molar pregnancy. The most common sites of choriocarcinoma metastasis are lungs, liver, and brain [2]. This case describes a patient with choriocarcinoma that presented with hemoptysis. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is a 22 year-old G2P1 female presenting at 36 weeks-gestation with one week of hemoptysis. She denied any other symptoms. On presentation, she was tachycardic. Physical examination demonstrated bibasilar crackles. Admission chest x-ray revealed diffuse bilateral infiltrates (Fig 1). Hs-troponin was elevated to 144 ng/L;however, EKG did not show ischemic changes. Cultures were obtained prior to empirically initiating antibiotics. Despite antibiotic treatment, hemoptysis worsened over her course and oxygen requirements increased. Infectious workup was negative. CT obtained for pulmonary embolism revealed bilateral patchy airspace opacities in lungs, suspected due to multifocal pneumonia (Fig 2). AFB smear and quantiferon were negative. After an emergent C-section for increased oxygen requirements, bronchoscopy with BAL was obtained and demonstrated diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. BAL was only positive for mildly increased CD4:CD8 ratio. Transbronchial biopsy was aborted due to bleed risk. Subsequent right lobe wedge biopsy confirmed metastatic choriocarcinoma. Her serum human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) level was found to be 20,713 milli-international units/mL. DISCUSSION: The etiology of hemoptysis was initially thought to be secondary to pneumonia. Differential diagnoses also included an acute COVID infection, alveolar hemorrhage, tuberculosis in a recently-immigrated patient, myocarditis, autoimmune etiology, and malignancy. Patient's risk factors included a prior miscarriage. Rarely, bleeding can occur as a result of metastatic lesions and may result in abdominal pain, hemoptysis, melena, or evidence of increased intracranial pressure from intracerebral hemorrhage [2]. Patients, such as the one described in this case, can exhibit pulmonary symptoms of dyspnea, cough, and chest pain caused by lung metastases. Upon closer examination of the CT scans, several of the opacities are nodular and consistent with GTN. Patients treated with surgery, chemotherapy, or a combination of both demonstrated similar treatment outcomes;chemotherapy may still be the preferred option. The overall cure rate in treating these tumors is currently > 90% [2]. CONCLUSIONS: GTN, although rare, should be considered as a differential diagnosis in women with a pregnancy history and risk factors that present with the primary symptom of hemoptysis. High index of suspicion and awareness of these neoplasms are necessary for timely diagnosis. Reference #1: Savage P. Winter M. Parker V. et al. Demographics, natural history and treatment outcomes of non-molar gestational choriocarcinoma: a UK population study. BJOG. 2020;127: 1102-1107 Reference #2: Lurain, J., 2010. Gestational trophoblastic disease I: epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, and management of hydatidiform mole. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(6), pp.531-539. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Crystal Ajja No relevant relationships by Heba Osman No relevant relationships by James Rowley